Type:
Category:
Volume:
3
Pages:
1341-1342
Year:
2002
Publisher:
In Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education
Abstract:
In this experiment, we investigate the correspondence between how graph-readers visually inspect a graph to answer a comparison question about two groups and the justifications they offer. We recorded how people visually inspected graphs using a device that restricted how much data they could see at any given time. Students offered a variety of justifications for why two groups differed (e.g., slices, cut-points, modal clumps), and these appear to correspond to how they visually parsed the data.
The CAUSE Research Group is supported in part by a member initiative grant from the American Statistical Association’s Section on Statistics and Data Science Education