Literature Index

Displaying 1081 - 1090 of 3326
  • Author(s):
    Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S.
    Editors:
    Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A.
    Year:
    1982
    Abstract:
    This chapter explores some psychological elements of the risk-assessment process. Its basic premises are that both the public and the experts are necessary participants in that process, that assessment is inherently subjective, and that understanding judgmental limitations is crucial to effective decision making.
  • Author(s):
    Hassad, Rossi A
    Year:
    2013
    Abstract:
    Technology-assisted instruction is a core focus of educational reform in most disciplines. This exploratory study (N=227) examined instructors’ attitudes toward technology integration for the teaching of introductory statistics at the college level. Salient attitudinal elements (including perceived usefulness, self-efficacy, and comfort), which can serve as barriers to, and facilitators of, technology integration were identified. Additionally, a preliminary scale (ATTIS) for measuring instructors’ attitudes toward technology integration was developed with acceptable levels of internal reliability and validity. The results underscore the need for training and support for instructors, by way of workshops, modeling of best practices through team teaching and mentoring, and other targeted professional development activities.
  • Author(s):
    Watson, J.M., & Moritz, J.B.
    Year:
    2003
    Abstract:
    One hundred-eight students in Grades 3, 5, 6, 7, and 9 were asked about their beliefs concerning fairness of dice before being presented with a few dice (at least one of which was "loaded") and asked to determine whether each die was fair. Four levels of beliefs about fairness and four levels of strategies for determining fairness were identified. Although there were structural similarities in the levels of response, the association between beliefs and strategies was not strong. Three or four years later, we interviewed 44 of these students again using the same protocol. Changes and consistencies in levels of response were noted for beliefs and strategies. The association of beliefs and strategies was similar after three or four years. We discuss future research and educational implications in terms of assumptions that are often made about students' understanding of fairness of dice, both prior to and after experimentation.
  • Author(s):
    Cramer, K. M. & Jackson, D. L.
    Editors:
    Goodall, G.
    Year:
    2006
    Abstract:
    This article evaluates and explores the correlation (+0.892) between the United States federal election winner and the most recent Washington Redskin home-game winner, a relation perfectly linked for 17 of 18 elections since franchise inception in 1936.
  • Author(s):
    Lori Koban and Erin McNelis
    Year:
    2008
    Abstract:
    Fantasy baseball serves as a vehicle for students to perform various data-gathering and statistical analyses.
  • Author(s):
    Gigerenzer, G. & Todd, P. M.
    Year:
    1999
    Abstract:
    Book description<br>How can anyone be rational in a world where knowledge is limited, time is pressing, and deep thought is often an unattainable luxury? In our book, "Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart," we invite readers to embark on a new journey into a land of rationality that differs from the familiar territory of cognitive science and economics. Traditional models of rationality in these fields have tended to view decision-makers as possessing supernatural powers of reason, limitless knowledge, and an eternity in which to make choices. But to understand decisions in the real world, we need a different, more psychologically plausible notion of rationality. This book provides such a view. It is about fast and frugal heuristics-simple rules for making decisions with realistic mental resources. These heuristics can enable both living organisms and artificial systems to make smart choices, judgments, and predictions by employing bounded rationality.<br><br>But when and how can such fast and frugal heuristics work? What heuristics are in the mind's "adaptive toolbox," and what building blocks compose them? Can judgments based simply on a single reason be as accurate as those based on many reasons? Could having less knowledge even lead to systematically better predictions than having more knowledge? We explore these questions by developing computational models of heuristics and testing them through theoretical analysis and practical experiments with people. We show how fast and frugal heuristics can yield adaptive decisions in situations as varied as choosing a mate, dividing resources among offspring, predicting high-school drop-out rates, and profiting from the stock market.<br><br>We have worked to create an interdisciplinary book that is both useful and engaging and will appeal to a wide audience. It is intended for readers interested in cognitive psychology, evolutionary psychology, and cognitive science, as well as in economics and artificial intelligence. We hope that it will also inspire anyone who simply wants to make good decisions.
  • Author(s):
    PARVATE, Vishakha,.GOULD, Robert and BEALS, Cynthia
    Year:
    2007
    Abstract:
    This paper describes a classroom experience using a data gathering and analysis tool to scaffold a learning process that involves students in analysis of their own understanding about data. An AP-Statistics class uses data about their own sleep patterns to investigate measures of variability. The class applies various measures of variability to the sleep data set and comments on their efficacy using a survey created in Fathom. The students comment on the measures in groups and construct a common understanding of which measure is the best and why. Students in a statistics class should find themselves routinely engaged in data analysis. We conjecture that encounters with their own assessment data increases their appreciation of data analysis at the same time that it helps them identify weak areas of understanding. The students are not only learning about data variability but also about statistical process, data gathering and analysis.
  • Author(s):
    Gal, I., &amp; Ginsburg, L.
    Year:
    1993
    Abstract:
    While many teachers of statistics are likely to focus on transmitting knowledge, many students are likely to have trouble with statistics due to non-cognitive factors, such as (math) anxiety or negative attitudes towards statistics, which can impede learning of statistics, or hinder the extent to which students will develop useful statistical intuitions and apply what they have learned outside the classroom. This paper explores the role of attitudes in the learning of statistics, examines existing instruments for assessing attitudes and beliefs of students, and provides suggestions for methods teachers can use to gauge where students stand on some non-cognitive factors.
  • Author(s):
    Gal, I., &amp; Ginsberg, L.
    Year:
    1993
    Abstract:
    This paper is organized in three sections. First, we examine the justification for attending to non-cognitive issues within the larger context of the goals of statistics education Next, we briefly review and critique existing approaches to research on students' beliefs and attitudes towards statistics. Finally, we explore implications for assessment practices in statistics. Finally, we explore implications for assessment practices in statistics education and for further research. (By research we refer both to "academic" research done for increasing general knowledge, as well as to local research that individual teachers or statistics departments can, and in our view should, undertake in order to be informed about where their students stand and to be able to provide a better service to learners.)
  • Author(s):
    Meacock, S.
    Editors:
    Goodall, G.
    Year:
    2003
    Abstract:
    This article shows how data from a television game show can be used as a basis for illustrating many statistical procedures.

Pages

The CAUSE Research Group is supported in part by a member initiative grant from the American Statistical Association’s Section on Statistics and Data Science Education

register