Motivated reasoning and the Wason selection task.


Authors: 
Dawson, E., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T
Volume: 
28
Pages: 
1379-1387
Year: 
2002
Publisher: 
Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
URL: 
http://www.psych.cornell.edu/sec/pubPeople/tdg1/Dawson.Gilo.Regan.pdf
Abstract: 

People tend to approach agreeable propositions with a bias toward confirmation and disagreeable propositions with a bias toward disconfirmation. Because the appropriate strategy for solving the four-card Wason selection task is to seek disconfirmation, the authors predicted that people motivated to reject a task rule should be more likely to solve the task than those without such motivation. In two studies, participants who considered a Wason task rule that implied their own early death (Study 1) or the validity of a threatening stereotype (Study 2) vastly outperformed participants who considered nonthreatening or agreeable rules. Discussion focuses on how a skeptical mindset may help people avoid confirmation bias both in the context of the Wason task and in everyday reasoning.

The CAUSE Research Group is supported in part by a member initiative grant from the American Statistical Association’s Section on Statistics and Data Science Education