Sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
<td>Within Normal Hours</td> | <td>Within Normal Hours</td> | ||
<td> <div align="center">12</div></td> | <td> <div align="center">12</div></td> | ||
</tr> | |||
tjos | |||
The results are: | The results are: | ||
Revision as of 14:15, 13 September 2009
Breaking News
The Wall Street Journal of September 8, 2009 reports on a study in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: “The researchers compared the outcomes of patients who underwent surgery between 6 a.m. and 4 p.m. for fractures of the femur or tibia to those who had comparable surgeries for similar fractures outside those normal hours.”
tjos The results are: Difference = p (1) - p (2) Estimate for difference: 0.170035 95% CI for difference: (0.0346494, 0.305420) Test for difference = 0 (vs not = 0): Z = 2.37 P-Value = 0.018 Fisher's exact test: P-Value = 0.026 Discussion 1. Why is the Fisher exact test P-Value (0.026) to be preferred to the other P-Value mentioned (0.018)? 2. The Wall Street Journal mentioned several caveats “making it difficult to determine the underlying reasons for the after-hours patients’ poor outcomes.” List a few practical significance hedges to the statistically significant result.Sample | Reoperations Needed |
Sample Size |
Sample Proportion |
|
Outside Normal Hours | 28 |
82 |
.3415 | |
Within Normal Hours | 12 |
|||
70 |
.1714 |