Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From ChanceWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
by Jacob Harris, ''Source'' (opennews.org) 22 May 2014
by Jacob Harris, ''Source'' (opennews.org) 22 May 2014


Harris identifies 6 ways to make mistakes in reporting data
Harris identifies 6 ways to make mistakes in reporting data:
*Sloppy proxieson  
*Sloppy proxieson  
*Dichotomizing
*Dichotomizing
Line 17: Line 17:
What happened here was that a large percentage of IP addresses could not be resolved to an address any more specific than “USA.” When that address was geocoded, it returned a point in the centroid of the continental United States, which placed it in the state of—you guessed it—Kansas!
What happened here was that a large percentage of IP addresses could not be resolved to an address any more specific than “USA.” When that address was geocoded, it returned a point in the centroid of the continental United States, which placed it in the state of—you guessed it—Kansas!
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<center>[[File:Porn_politics.png‎  | 500px]]<center>
<center>[[File:Porn_politics.png‎  | 500px]]</center>


Submitted by Paul Alper
Submitted by Paul Alper

Revision as of 18:49, 2 June 2014

Politics and porn (What's the matter with Kansas?)

Distrust your data
by Jacob Harris, Source (opennews.org) 22 May 2014

Harris identifies 6 ways to make mistakes in reporting data:

  • Sloppy proxieson
  • Dichotomizing
  • Correlation does not equal causation
  • Ecological inference
  • Geocoding
  • Data naivete

His principle example is a story that was widely covered in social media. It concerned but the biggest is related to "geocoding"

What happened here was that a large percentage of IP addresses could not be resolved to an address any more specific than “USA.” When that address was geocoded, it returned a point in the centroid of the continental United States, which placed it in the state of—you guessed it—Kansas!

Porn politics.png

Submitted by Paul Alper