Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From ChanceWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:


==Variability in employment figures==
==Politics and pborn (What's the matter with Kansas?)==
[http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/02/upshot/how-not-to-be-misled-by-the-jobs-report.html?hp&target=comments#commentsContainer How not to be misled by the jobs report]<br>
[https://source.opennews.org/en-US/learning/distrust-your-data/ Distrust your data]<br>
by Neil Irwin, New York Times, Upshot blog, 1 May 2014
y Neil Irwin, New York Times, Upshot blog, 1 May 2014


Much attention is paid to the Commerce Departments monthly report of the number of jobs added or lost by the US economy.  But only rarely do reports in the popular press highlight the fact
Much attention is paid to the Commerce Departments monthly report of the number of jobs added or lost by the US economy.  But only rarely do reports in the popular press highlight the fact
Line 11: Line 11:
<center>[[File:JobReportSim.png | 500px]]<center>
<center>[[File:JobReportSim.png | 500px]]<center>


Submitted by Bill Peterson
Submitted by Paul Alper

Revision as of 18:37, 2 June 2014

Politics and pborn (What's the matter with Kansas?)

Distrust your data
y Neil Irwin, New York Times, Upshot blog, 1 May 2014

Much attention is paid to the Commerce Departments monthly report of the number of jobs added or lost by the US economy. But only rarely do reports in the popular press highlight the fact that these figures are based on survey data, and hence subject to sampling variability.

Irwin's post here includes an animated simulation (screen capture show below) that indicates what 12 months of sample data might look like based on various assumptions about what the economy is really doing.

JobReportSim.png

Submitted by Paul Alper