Sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
What happened here was that a large percentage of IP addresses could not be resolved to an address any more specific than “USA.” When that address was geocoded, it returned a point in the centroid of the continental United States, which placed it in the state of—you guessed it—Kansas! | What happened here was that a large percentage of IP addresses could not be resolved to an address any more specific than “USA.” When that address was geocoded, it returned a point in the centroid of the continental United States, which placed it in the state of—you guessed it—Kansas! | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
<center>[[File: | <center>[[File:Porn_politics.png | 500px]]<center> | ||
Submitted by Paul Alper | Submitted by Paul Alper | ||
Revision as of 18:48, 2 June 2014
Politics and porn (What's the matter with Kansas?)
Distrust your data
by Jacob Harris, Source (opennews.org) 22 May 2014
Harris identifies 6 ways to make mistakes in reporting data
- Sloppy proxieson
- Dichotomizing
- Correlation does not equal causation
- Ecological inference
- Geocoding
- Data naivete
His principle example is a story that was widely covered in social media. It concerned but the biggest is related to "geocoding"
What happened here was that a large percentage of IP addresses could not be resolved to an address any more specific than “USA.” When that address was geocoded, it returned a point in the centroid of the continental United States, which placed it in the state of—you guessed it—Kansas!
Submitted by Paul Alper