Sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== | ===Comments=== | ||
A reasonable explanation for the probability confusion alluded to in <br> | |||
a.) Linda is a bank teller.<br> | |||
b.) Linda is a bank teller and is active in the feminist movement.<br> | |||
is that the language of logic and the language of English are not identical. For example, "Or" in logic means either X or Y or both, | |||
whereas "or" in English usually means the exclusive "Or" in logic, | |||
either X or Y but not both. | |||
When it comes to "and," the reader, when not misreading the "and" for "or," tends to substitute "who," so instead of | |||
X and Y, | |||
the reader is really considering | |||
X|Y | |||
which also leads to the belief that (b) is more likely than (a). | |||
Submitted by | Submitted by Paul Alper |
Revision as of 01:38, 4 November 2010
Comments
A reasonable explanation for the probability confusion alluded to in
a.) Linda is a bank teller.
b.) Linda is a bank teller and is active in the feminist movement.
is that the language of logic and the language of English are not identical. For example, "Or" in logic means either X or Y or both, whereas "or" in English usually means the exclusive "Or" in logic, either X or Y but not both.
When it comes to "and," the reader, when not misreading the "and" for "or," tends to substitute "who," so instead of X and Y, the reader is really considering X|Y which also leads to the belief that (b) is more likely than (a).
Submitted by Paul Alper