Sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[http://www.causeweb.org/wiki/chance/index.php/Chance_News_%28September-October_2005%29#Just_how_reliable_are_scientific_papers.3F Chance News 28] | [http://www.causeweb.org/wiki/chance/index.php/Chance_News_%28September-October_2005%29#Just_how_reliable_are_scientific_papers.3F Chance News 28] | ||
in the Public Library of Science (PLoS) Medicine journal, in August 2005. | |||
[http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 Why most published research findings Are false] | |||
Submitted by Bill Peterson | Submitted by Bill Peterson | ||
Revision as of 23:15, 28 October 2010
Medical misinformation
Lies, damned lies, and medical science
by David H. Freedman, The Atlantic, November 2010
To be continued... Chance News 28
in the Public Library of Science (PLoS) Medicine journal, in August 2005. Why most published research findings Are false Submitted by Bill Peterson