Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From ChanceWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
==Demystifying conditional probability==
==Demystifying conditional probability?==
[http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/25/chances-are/ Chances are]<br>
[http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/25/chances-are/ Chances are]<br>
by Steven Strogatz, ''New York Times'', Opinionator blog, 25 April 2010
by Steven Strogatz, ''New York Times'', Opinionator blog, 25 April 2010


Steven Strogatz, an applied mathematics professor at Cornell University, has been writing highly engaging weekly installments about mathematics for the Opinionator.  His post this week is about probability;  more specifically, it focuses on conditional probability.  Of course, this topic is a notorious source of confusion. (Indeed, this edition of Chance News includes another appearance of the Monty Hall problem, which refuses to stay solved!)  
Steven Strogatz, an applied mathematics professor at Cornell University, has been writing engaging weekly installments about mathematics for the Opinionator.  His post this week is about probability;  more specifically, it focuses on conditional probability.  Of course, this topic is a notorious source of confusion. (Indeed, this edition of Chance News includes [http://www.causeweb.org/wiki/chance/index.php/Chance_News_63#Bird_brains_vs._birdbrains another appearance of the Monty Hall problem], which refuses to stay solved!)  


The article discusses several famous examples, including the false positive problem in diagnostic medical screening, and the conflicting arguments over spousal abuse and murder at the the O.J. Simpson trial.  Strogatz expresses his enthusiasm for the approach of Gerd Gigerenzer
   
   
Submitted by Bill Peterson, based on a suggestion from Dan Bent (an intro statistics student)
Submitted by Bill Peterson, based on a suggestion from Dan Bent (an intro statistics student)

Revision as of 01:43, 28 April 2010

Demystifying conditional probability?

Chances are
by Steven Strogatz, New York Times, Opinionator blog, 25 April 2010

Steven Strogatz, an applied mathematics professor at Cornell University, has been writing engaging weekly installments about mathematics for the Opinionator. His post this week is about probability; more specifically, it focuses on conditional probability. Of course, this topic is a notorious source of confusion. (Indeed, this edition of Chance News includes another appearance of the Monty Hall problem, which refuses to stay solved!)

The article discusses several famous examples, including the false positive problem in diagnostic medical screening, and the conflicting arguments over spousal abuse and murder at the the O.J. Simpson trial. Strogatz expresses his enthusiasm for the approach of Gerd Gigerenzer

Submitted by Bill Peterson, based on a suggestion from Dan Bent (an intro statistics student)

Tea party graphics

A mighty pale tea
by Charles M. Blow, New York Times, 16 April 2010

This article recounts Blow's experience visiting a Tea Party rally as a self-identified "infiltrator." He was interested in assessing the group's diversity. Reproduced below is a portion of a graphic, entitled The many shades of whites, that accompanied the article.

Shades.png

The data are from a recent NYT/CBS Poll.

Submitted by Paul Alper