Good evening, So this isn't about SBI per se, but is with regard to the blog posts about finding real data (which are great, by the way). I happened upon this article in Lancet that I like for a couple of reasons. It's from 1998, but I think it's still worth considering: Wolkenstein et al. (1998). Randomised comparison of thalidomide versus placebo in toxic epidermal necrolysis. The Lancet 352, 1586-1589. It's a small sample size (appropriate for Fisher's Exact Test), and the study had to be stopped because more people were dying from the active treatment than placebo (10/12 vs. 3/10). Thus, it's a nice opportunity to talk about ethics when studying human subjects and provides a real (and I think interesting as well) example of Fisher's Test. Megan Megan J. Olson Hunt, PhD ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, STATISTICS ............................................................................. Department of Natural and Applied Sciences, LS 465 University of Wisconsin-Green Bay 2420 Nicolet Drive Green Bay, WI 54311 Office: LS 427 | blog.uwgb.edu/olsonhunt | olsonhum(a)uwgb.edu